Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900K - 199 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $113.0 vs $468.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900K - $0.57 vs $2.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348516 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
193
96.98492462311557%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
23.553719008264462%
Price, $
$468
24%
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |