Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900K - 140 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $113.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900K - $0.81 vs $3.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348611 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
98.57142857142858%
Value, $/FPS
$3.55/FPS
22.816901408450708%
Price, $
$490
23%
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |