Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $113.0 vs $531.86
- Up to 76% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-13900KF - $0.45 vs $1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-11400F - 283 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
253
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280542 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
283
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
23%
Price, $
$531.86
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280541 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |