Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3586 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-2405S - 263 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $46.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-11600 - $0.22 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
38.59649122807018%
Price, $
$150
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349451 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
210
79.84790874524715%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349450 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
25.21206409048068%
Multi-Core
1429
17.452369320957498%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | No |