Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 263 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $39.95 vs $150.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-11600 - $0.19 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
33.333333333333336%
Price, $
$150
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349457 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
80.22813688212928%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
27.379830348727612%
Multi-Core
992
12.115290669272106%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |