Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-3240 - 291 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $41.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 76% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-11600K - $0.16 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
291
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
23.52941176470588%
Price, $
$198.9
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
258
88.65979381443299%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
25.343092406221405%
Multi-Core
1137
13.253292924583285%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |