Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 851 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 3 3200G - 275 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $80.0 vs $160.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-12600KF - $0.35 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
59.32203389830508%
Price, $
$160.99
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348723 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
227
82.54545454545455%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
42.55663430420712%
Multi-Core
3013
25.033233632436026%
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |