Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 136 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $39.95 vs $297.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600K - $0.36 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
16.43835616438356%
Price, $
$297.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349143 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
112
82.35294117647058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |