Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 601 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $50.0 vs $515.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.4 vs $3.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 18% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 148 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
84.45945945945947%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.48/FPS
11.49425287356322%
Price, $
$515
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $515 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.15023474178404%
Multi-Core
1051
9.826103216155573%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |