Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $50.0 vs $567.98
- Up to 86% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-13900 - $0.4 vs $2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 65% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G4900 - 204 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
124
60.78431372549019%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.78/FPS
14.388489208633096%
Price, $
$567.98
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
22.697126013264555%
Multi-Core
1051
6.398392791915257%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |