Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $50.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900K - $0.45 vs $3.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - 125 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
89.60000000000001%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349161 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.92/FPS
11.479591836734695%
Price, $
$490
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
35.22012578616352%
Multi-Core
1051
11.470042562479538%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |