Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-10900F - 137 vs 124 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $244.77 vs $593.77
- Up to 55% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600KF - $1.97 vs $4.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
45.49653579676674%
Price, $
$593.77
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348609 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
90.51094890510949%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
61.012013105205675%
Multi-Core
8426
54.66104443723646%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |