Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $46.0 vs $99.03
- Up to 48% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10100 - $0.39 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-2405S - 132 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
119
90.15151515151516%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349764 minutes ago
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
37.51753155680224%
Multi-Core
1429
33.902728351126925%
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |