Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4150 - 132 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $48.0 vs $99.03
- Up to 49% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10100 - $0.38 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
50.66666666666667%
Price, $
$99.03
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349516 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
95.45454545454545%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
73.00140252454418%
Multi-Core
2047
48.56465005931198%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |