Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2053 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $46.0 vs $66.82
- Up to 18% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-7100T - $1.02 vs $1.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than Core i5-2405S - 54 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2405S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
45
83.33333333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349952 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
82.25806451612904%
Price, $
$66.82
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349953 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
47.939068100358426%
Multi-Core
1429
63.230088495575224%
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |