Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G4900 - 127 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $50.0 vs $66.82
- Up to 21% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-7100T - $0.42 vs $0.53 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
79.24528301886792%
Price, $
$66.82
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350020 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
94.48818897637796%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350019 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
55.19713261648745%
Multi-Core
1051
46.50442477876106%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |