Buy on Amazon
$66.82
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3900 - 523 vs 459 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $39.95 vs $66.82
- Up to 31% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-7100T - $0.09 vs $0.13 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
523
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
69.23076923076923%
Price, $
$66.82
59%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3 i3-7100T Dual-Core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350026 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
459
87.76290630975143%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.060931899641574%
Multi-Core
992
43.89380530973451%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
