Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3586 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $46.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-11600 - $1.84 vs $2.0 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 200% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-2405S - 75 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 12 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
25
33.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349516 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
25.21206409048068%
Multi-Core
1429
17.452369320957498%
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |