Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 2641 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G4900 - 277 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $50.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 87% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-2500K - $0.18 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 54 vs 95 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
277
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
12.76595744680851%
Price, $
$390.81
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
276
99.63898916967509%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
95.3560371517028%
Multi-Core
1051
54.711087975013015%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |