Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 966 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2500K - 161 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $43.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 89% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2500K - $0.27 vs $2.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 54 vs 95 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
157
97.51552795031056%
Value, $/FPS
$2.49/FPS
10.843373493975903%
Price, $
$390.81
11%
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349407 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
64.92462311557789%
Multi-Core
1921
98.01020408163265%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |