Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1208 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 2% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-2500K - 113 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $48.0 vs $390.81
- Up to 88% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-2500K - $0.42 vs $3.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
111
98.23008849557522%
Value, $/FPS
$3.52/FPS
11.931818181818182%
Price, $
$390.81
12%
Buy for $390.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
62.055715658021136%
Multi-Core
1921
93.84465070835368%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |