Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $131.71 vs $244.77
- Up to 43% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900F - $0.39 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-4440 - 360 vs 336 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 20 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
336
93.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$131.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $131.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360526 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
360
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
57.35294117647059%
Price, $
$244.77
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1033
61.63484486873509%
Multi-Core
2902
34.441015903156895%
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |