Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $70.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 59% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900F - $1.67 vs $4.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 43% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-4570 - 60 vs 42 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4570 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 20 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5 i5-4570 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150 - Quad-core (4 Core) - 6 MB Cache
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348906 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
40.931372549019606%
Price, $
$244.77
28%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4570
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4570
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1093
65.21479713603819%
Multi-Core
3066
36.38737241870401%
Intel Core i5-4570 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
