Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570T is 272 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Performs up to 16% better in Starfield than Core i3-3240 - 52 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-4570T - $41.0 vs $90.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-4570T - $0.91 vs $1.73 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
52.601156069364166%
Price, $
$90
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349807 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
45
86.53846153846155%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
53.838678328474245%
Multi-Core
1137
57.02106318956871%
Intel Core i5-4570T | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |