Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $139.51 vs $147.99
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670 - 206 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670 - $0.72 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 60 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
182
88.3495145631068%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
93.5064935064935%
Price, $
$139.51
100%
Buy for $139.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354420 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$147.99
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
52.01952951620063%
Multi-Core
3228
43.99618372631866%
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |