Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $139.51 vs $150.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 9% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4670 - 179 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4670 - $0.84 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $139.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281009 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281008 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |