Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1586 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $139.51 vs $140.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670 - 186 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670 - $0.75 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
182
97.84946236559139%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
97.40259740259741%
Price, $
$139.51
100%
Buy for $139.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354420 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
86.62232076866223%
Multi-Core
3228
67.98652064026959%
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |