Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2844 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-4670 - 369 vs 341 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - $113.0 vs $139.51
- Up to 24% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-4670 - $0.31 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 12 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
341
92.41192411924119%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
75.60975609756098%
Price, $
$139.51
80%
Buy for $139.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354425 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
369
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
59.765425803161655%
Multi-Core
3228
42.42902208201893%
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |