Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than FX-8300 - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $47.98 vs $55.26
- Up to 9% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-4670S - $0.29 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280538 minutes ago
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280537 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |