Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 395 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G3258 - 127 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $51.36 vs $99.95
- Up to 46% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-6400 - $0.43 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
54.43037974683544%
Price, $
$99.95
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349760 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
120
94.48818897637796%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349759 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
55.17551755175517%
Multi-Core
1074
35.52762156797883%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |