Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 127 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $39.95 vs $99.95
- Up to 57% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-6400 - $0.34 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
43.037974683544306%
Price, $
$99.95
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349870 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
93.7007874015748%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.29522952295229%
Multi-Core
992
32.81508435329143%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |