Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 982 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than FX-8300 - 182 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $47.98 vs $99.95
- Up to 44% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-6400 - $0.31 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
56.36363636363636%
Price, $
$99.95
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349751 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
154
84.61538461538461%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349750 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |