Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-660 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $149.95 vs $244.77
- Up to 31% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900F - $0.47 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-660 - 360 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-660 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 20 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
319
88.61111111111111%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359822 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
360
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
69.11764705882352%
Price, $
$244.77
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |