Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-660 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 4745 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $149.95 vs $567.98
- Up to 64% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-13900 - $1.51 vs $4.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 35% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-660 - 134 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-660 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 32 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
99
73.88059701492537%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361287 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.24/FPS
35.613207547169814%
Price, $
$567.98
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |