Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-660 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-660 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-660.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-660
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $149.95 vs $530.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.3 vs $4.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-660 - 129 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-660 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
115
89.14728682170544%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361222 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.11/FPS
31.630170316301705%
Price, $
$530
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-660 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |