Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 219 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $63.5 vs $270.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.54 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7400T - 119 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
98.31932773109243%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349163 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
23.78854625550661%
Price, $
$270
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
86.62691652470187%
Multi-Core
2806
40.22362385321101%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |