Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1864 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1820 - 266 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $46.41 vs $112.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - $0.2 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
47.61904761904762%
Price, $
$112
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361276 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
235
88.34586466165413%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
35.63134978229318%
Multi-Core
825
17.06661150186181%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |