Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 6 days older than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - 193 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $150.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.78 vs $1.18 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
98.96373056994818%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
66.10169491525424%
Price, $
$225.99
66%
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348549 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348549 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |