Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 191 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $185.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 7% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $1.1 vs $1.18 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
93.22033898305085%
Price, $
$225.99
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348550 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
168
87.95811518324608%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348549 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |