Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3450 - 191 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $69.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.4 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
33.898305084745765%
Price, $
$225.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348798 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
171
89.52879581151832%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
37.406947890818856%
Multi-Core
1781
24.6300649979256%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |