Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700K is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900F - 122 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $241.05 vs $244.77
- Up to 10% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900F - $1.98 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$241.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $241.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353908 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
91.80327868852459%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
90.41095890410959%
Price, $
$244.77
98%
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
75.52951780081118%
Multi-Core
8426
85.92698347950235%
Intel Core i7-11700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |