Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than FX-4300 - 230 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $48.02 vs $369.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700KF - $0.25 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
15.527950310559005%
Price, $
$369.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362626 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
189
82.17391304347827%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362626 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |