Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 230 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $39.95 vs $369.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700KF - $0.21 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
13.043478260869565%
Price, $
$369.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362593 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
83.04347826086956%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362593 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |