Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 3222 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 230 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $46.41 vs $369.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700KF - $0.24 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
14.906832298136644%
Price, $
$369.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362626 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
190
82.6086956521739%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362625 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
17.00727398683755%
Multi-Core
825
4.685902533227309%
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |