Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 2391 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $54.95 vs $65.23
- Up to 13% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 1300X - $0.33 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2600 - 172 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
168
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $54.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280529 minutes ago
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280531 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |