Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3111 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $82.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900F - $0.55 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 31% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-2700K - 194 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 20 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
148
76.28865979381443%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349098 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
43.65079365079366%
Price, $
$244.77
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
39.618138424821005%
Multi-Core
2264
26.86921433657726%
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |