Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-3770 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-3770 is 177 days older than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 113 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than FX-8350 - $80.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8350 - $0.71 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
98.23008849557522%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
42.51497005988024%
Price, $
$185
43%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |