Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $75.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-10700F - $0.39 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i7-3770S - 204 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 16 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
192
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348790 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
35.13513513513513%
Price, $
$225.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
41.50124069478908%
Multi-Core
2234
30.894758677914535%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |