Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3210 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $70.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - $0.63 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
34.61538461538461%
Price, $
$225.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348919 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
111
89.51612903225806%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
31.575682382133998%
Multi-Core
1018
14.078274097635182%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |