Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 657 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $46.41 vs $319.88
- Up to 86% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-3820 - $0.24 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
14.37125748502994%
Price, $
$319.88
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362801 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
190
99.47643979057592%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
79.57860615883307%
Multi-Core
825
35.88516746411483%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |